CDP runs a global disclosure system that enables companies, cities, states, and regions to measure and manage their environmental impacts, with a focus on climate change, water security, and deforestation. A detailed and independent methodology is used to assess companies, allocating a score of A to D- based on the comprehensiveness of disclosure, awareness, and management of environmental risks and demonstration of best practices associated with environmental leadership, such as setting ambitious and meaningful targets. Those that do not disclose or provide insufficient information are marked with an F. The CDP questionnaire is aligned with the recommendations of the Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD).
Corbion has been participating in the CDP Climate Change and Supply Chain programs since 2016 to provide transparency on how we manage risks and opportunities related to climate change. In 2020, Corbion has been recognized for leadership in corporate sustainability by CDP, securing a place on its prestigious ''A-list" for tackling climate change. Corbion was recognized for its actions to cut emissions, mitigate climate risks, and develop the low-carbon economy, based on the data reported through CDP’s 2020 climate change questionnaire.
Corbion started participating in the Forests questionnaire in 2018 and in 2020, we participated in the Water questionnaire for the first time.
Climate change / General
Climate change / Supplier engagement
Forests / Palm oil
Forests / Soy
Water / General
EcoVadis sustainability ratings and scorecards assess the environmental and social performance of companies. The assessment framework covers 21 sustainability criteria (from CO2 emissions to human rights and business ethics) aligned with GRI, Global Compact, and ISO 26000.
Corbion received the Platinum rating in the 2020 EcoVadis CSR assessment, which implies Corbion is in the top 1% of all suppliers in our sector, assessed worldwide. Our full EcoVadis sustainability profile is available on the Corbion website.
The Executive Committee has overall responsibility for sustainability and decides on the strategy and targets. We use a sustainability dashboard with qualitative and quantitative indicators, to monitor our progress on the strategic sustainability initiatives. The dashboard is reviewed by the Board of Management each quarter and is discussed with the Executive Committee at least twice a year. The Director of Sustainability reports to the CSSO and drives the implementation and reporting of the strategic initiatives. Accountability for managing sustainability initiatives and delivering against targets lies with the relevant businesses and functions. This responsibility is anchored in business targets and personal targets at various levels in the organization.
Corbion's sustainability sounding board, which includes representatives from all Corbion business units and functions, advises the Director of Sustainability and the CSSO on the sustainability strategy and specific initiatives.
Annual Report TCFD 2020
The Task Force on Climate-related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) was established to improve transparency of and for the financial sector and businesses on the risks and opportunities related to climate change. Corbion is committed to identifying and addressing both its own impact on the climate as well as the potential impact of climate-related developments on the company. The primary focus of climate-related disclosures is through the CDP questionnaires, which are aligned with the TCFD guidelines.
On top of this Corbion has, in collaboration with Utrecht University, initiated a pilot study for the application of scenario analysis feasible for small to medium enterprises subject to the non-financial reporting directive (NFRD). Below we provide a summary of the relevant information for the TCFD and the preliminary findings of our scenario analysis pilot.
Under the chairmanship of the Chief Executive Officer, the members of the Executive Committee have overall responsibility for sustainability and decide on the strategy and targets. The Executive Committee shares responsibility for developing objectives and the strategy, determining the risk profile, and implementing strategic and operational policies. The CEO is also head of the Climate Change Steering Committee. The CEO has been given these responsibilities because sustainability is key to Corbion's strategy and hence responsibilities are embedded in the highest management level.
Annually, there are two formal meetings with the full Executive Committee to discuss sustainability. All formal Executive Committee meetings cover climate-related topics. The Climate Change Steering Committe (CEO, CSSO, VP Procurement, VP Engineering, Maintenance, and Technology, Sustainability Director, R&D program lead, and Finance Director) meets quarterly. The Executive Committee members have informal meetings as well, covering whatever important matters arise, varying from sustainability and climate change to risks and profits.
To encourage our employees to address climate-related issues, both the Short-Term Incentive Plan (STIP) and Long-Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) include Sustainability targets. One of these targets is the progress towards achieving our Science Based Target. See Remuneration Board of Management for more information on these incentive plans; the STIP and LTIP targets that are agreed with the Board of Management also apply to all employees included in the STIP and LTIP.
Corbion closely monitors the increasing risks associated with a warming climate. Although we have not identified any acute (<1 year) or significant medium-term (1-5 years) risks related to climate change, there are some risks that Corbion might be exposed to in the future. The currently most relevant physical climate risks for Corbion relate to the increased severity of extreme weather events and potential supply-chain disruptions if key suppliers are adversely impacted by climate change. Key transitional risks come from potential government regulation and shifts in consumer preferences. Corbion is committed to early action in anticipation of these risks to limit potential impacts.
Due to the nature of Corbion’s businesses there are also opportunities related to climate change. For Corbion, sustainability and climate change are drivers for innovation. Opportunities present themselves most prominently in relation to the transition toward a low-carbon economy. Examples include PLA bioplastics (through our joint venture with Total) and our Algae Ingredients platform.
In order to identify and better understand the current implications of future events Corbion has explored the use of scenario analysis in collaboration with Utrecht University. In line with the TCFD recommendations we have assessed the potential impacts of both a transition risk (<2⁰C warming by 2100) and physical risk (±4⁰C warming by 2100) scenario on parts of our business.
Key assumptions for the transition risk scenario included a carbon price ranging from €50 - €150/t CO2equiv, either globally or locally implemented, stricter governmental regulations on different fronts, and increasing competition between natural and agricultural lands with the consequential competition between food and non-food crops.
Key assumptions for the physical risk scenario included an increase in the number and/or intensity of extreme weather events, increased water stress in certain areas with corresponding yield reductions in agricultural areas, supply-chain disruptions, and a reduced demand for biobased solutions.
Running from 2020 to 2040 the key takeaway from the scenario workshops was the loading of transition risks in the upcoming decade transforming to mostly physical risks in the 2030s and beyond. As a pilot exercise the main outcomes were related to the creation of awareness in senior management of the potential impact and timing of climate-related risks and subsequent inclusion of climate-related risks in the enterprise-wide risk management.
Many of the identified short- and medium-term risks and opportunities were already part of day-to-day decision-making. The scenario analysis has given them a more explicit place in the company’s risk management strategy in relation to climate change. In this section we will shortly argue why we think the identified risks are not yet material for Corbion.
An increase in the severity of extreme weather events can have significant consequences for Corbion’s operations and ability to deliver. However, the projected timeframe of these changes together with the diversified global footprint of our operations and supply chain makes this more of a long-term risk. Also, Corbion uses a small amount of feedstock relative to the respective global markets, making the company less vulnerable to bad harvests and price fluctuations. This means that Corbion will monitor developments in this area regularly, but does not consider it a material risk at this moment.
Supply-chain disruptions can occur for many different reasons. The main difference is that climate-related disruptions can be systemic in nature and therefore have a much more significant impact. However, also for this type of physical risk the long-term timeframe makes the climate-specific part of this risk something that we monitor but not consider material at this moment.
Increased governmental regulations with regards to climate change are considered very likely in the near future. Due to our global footprint and presence in the European Union Corbion is subject to many different types of legislation and also some of the most stringent. To anticipate these regulations Corbion is constantly trying to find new ways to reduce its environmental impact, while participating actively in voluntary initiatives such as the Science Based Targets initiative and CDP.
Changing consumer preferences is not just a climate change related risk, as an ongoing trend this is already included in day-to-day management practices. Also, due to the nature of our business we see changing consumer preferences as more of an opportunity than a risk. As we continue to develop and apply scenario analysis we aim to identify potential climate-related risks at an early stage. Once risks and opportunities are identified and deemed (potentially) material in the short, medium, or long term they are included in the overall risk assessment process and assigned a risk owner for management and monitoring. For more details please refer to our CDP disclosure.
Metrics and targets
Corbion discloses its Scope I, II, and III emissions (see Sustainability statements/Natural capital/ Greenhouse gas emissions and CDP). For internal planning purposes Corbion uses a carbon price of €50/t CO2equiv. In 2019, Corbion has committed to reduce its Scope I, II, and III GHG emissions by 33% per ton of product by 2030 (base year: 2016). This target has been approved by the Science Based Target initiative, confirming that our current emission reduction plans are in line with the Paris climate agreement to keep global warming well below 2⁰C. Corbion also aspires to use 100% renewable electricity by 2030. The commitment to that ambition is made through the RE100 initiative. In 2020 our use of renewable electricity was 71%.
We used the GRI Standards core option as a basis for our 2020 report. The selection of topics included in the report is based on a materiality assessment (see Materiality and stakeholder engagement). The environmental and social results for the material topics in this report cover all entities that belong to the scope of the consolidated financial statements. Our joint venture Total Corbion PLA is excluded. The scope of the environmental data includes Corbion's manufacturing sites. Offices and R&D laboratories are not included, except for our R&D laboratories and offices located at our Gorinchem, Totowa, and Araucária manufacturing sites.
Data is collected from various reporting systems. For each KPI, data reporters and data reviewers are defined, either at site level or at corporate level. The data reporter is responsible for the annual reporting of the data via the central reporting systems and for document retention and record-keeping related to this data. The data reviewer (from Finance) is responsible for the validation of the reported data. Site-specific data is consolidated and reviewed at corporate level by Finance and the Sustainability team. The review includes a comparison to data from previous years and a review of changes that could have impacted the results, such as improvement projects. In case of uncertainties, data estimation may be required, which is validated during review. We strive to continuously improve the data collection process and the reliability of the data. Significant changes that impact comparability including changes in measurement methods are explained in footnotes.
Non-financial KPIs marked by "√ " are reviewed by external auditor.
- 1 Ansari, D., & Holz, F. (2019). Anticipating global energy, climate and policy in 2055: Constructing qualitative and quantitative narratives. Energy Research & Social Science, 58, 101250.